| "Concerns About the
         Future"(Submitted by the Steering Committee of the
         Concerned Residents of Del Monte Forest and Monterey
         County)
 Two Non-Profit
         Organizations Residents of Del Monte Forest are able to communicate
         with two non-profit corporations concerning the quality of
         life in the Forest. The Position/Purpose of each
         organization follows: Concerned Residents of Pebble Beach and
            Monterey County
            
            To maintain the residential character of Del Monte
            Forest, we: 
               Are dedicated to preserving the residential
               community in Del Monte Forest.Support limits and controls on any further
               expansion of commercial property.Oppose further conversion of property to
               commercial usage.Oppose excessive commercial development in the
               Forest that will have an adverse impact on Forest
               residential areas and on neighboring communities.Support all efforts that will enhance the
               residential environment.Support limited low density residential
               development.Support a first-class Equestrian Center in the
               Forest and preservation of the Forest Trail
               System. Del Monte Forest Property Owners
            (DMFPO) - To promote and preserve the high standards
               of the residential community of Del Monte Forest in
               Monterey County, California;
               
               - To obtain such additional community facilities as
               are necessary for the safety, comfort, health and
               welfare of residents of the area; - To cooperate in the proper and desirable
               development of the Del Monte Forest area; and to
               promote harmony, civic enthusiasm, and community
               pride.
 
 Measure "A" - Pebble Beach
            Company's Initiative and DMFPO Action On October 10, 2000 the DMFPO Board of Directors voted to
         support the Pebble Beach Company's Initiative,Measure"A" on
         the November 7th ballot, in exchange for signing an
         agreement with the Company to limit the future development
         of new hotel rooms at The Lodge and Inn at Spanish Bay to a
         total of 210 rooms and to construct a new equestrian center
         before the existing one is destroyed for the development of
         a new golf course. With the agreement, the Company agrees to
         support the construction of Highway One Gate improvements
         and shall respond to reasonable concerns of traffic in The
         Lodge and Spanish Bay areas. (The Company has very limited
         obligations under Measure "A" to resolve existing and future
         traffic problem). On November 7th, 2000, Monterey County voters approved
         Measure "A". However, Pebble Beach Company's Initiative
         (Measure "A") and their Forest development plans must be
         approved by the California Coastal Commission and Monterey
         County Supervisors before any construction begins.
 
 Residents Concerns
 An independent, professional research firm was recently
         commissioned by the Concerned Residents of Pebble Beach to
         conduct a survey of Forest residents on issues that involve
         the quality of life in the residential community. The firm
         reported that half of the Forest residents adamantly
         oppose further commercial expansion by the Pebble Beach
         Company. It is difficult to understand why the DMFPO Board of
         Directors agreed to a 46% increase in hotel rooms and
         more conference rooms in the Forest when residents oppose
         such a massive commercial expansion. Do the DMFPO Directors
         really represent the interest of the Forest residents?
 
 Future of the Forest
 Individuals and organizations in the Forest and in
         adjacent communities that are truly concerned about the
         impact of a major development in the Forest should question
         whether land use planning by initiative will serve them
         well, now and for the long-term. Isn't it also reasonable to see definitive development
         plans, with a well-done Environmental Impact Report, before
         supporting or opposing the plans? The DMFPO Directors appear
         to have ignored Forest residents concerns and lost sight of
         what good land use planning requires. |